I haven't decided whether or not I want to sell it yet. FG-X has it's own comp, but its a lot more subtle and clean, whereas the the SSL is more forward and punchy.ĮDIT: I may have FG-X up for sale soon for cheap. If you use Ozone and are mixing entirely ITB, check out the SSL Master bus comp. Test for yourself and do not let hype/marketing decide for you. It sounds REALLY good, is dummy proof, and very useful to the pro or the novice. It's an all-in-one solution for excellent mixes. I suggest using both programs before buying (if possible) and coming to your own conclusions. Slate Digital FG-X is the best software mastering plug-in I've ever used.
but it does have a sound of it's own, it does cause distortion artifacts on guitars in certain kinds of mixes, and it doesn't have a lot of the features of Ozone. They don't spend all of their time on forums hyping up their products a year before they are released.ĭon't get me wrong, FG-X is definitely good. Izotope just doesn't have the hype/marketing power of Slate.
It should be obvious to everyone by now that it is very possible to use it to achieve professional results. With pros like Sturgis and Sneap both using Ozone and producing GREAT results, there should be no reason for anybody to continue talking shit about Ozone. I'm not a fan of the band, but it's a great sounding album, and the mastering doesn't seem to suffer in any way. (multiband comps, eqs, etc.)Īndy Sneap has recently said he used Ozone (and only Ozone) to master the new album by Dimmur Borgir. Both are good, but I find Ozone has a lot to offer that FG-X doesn't. Slate Digital FG-X Virtual Mastering Pro, Compressor Plugins.
0 kommentar(er)
